Comments on: Feliks Audio Envy Review https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/ Independent Portable and Desktop Audio Reviews Wed, 18 Oct 2023 03:40:45 +0000 hourly 1 By: Marcus https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16698 Thu, 12 Jan 2023 22:17:00 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16698 In reply to Bülent.

I have not personally tested the Edge NQ but the Vrms output levels should be more than enough. Typically SE is 2Vrms and balanced can be around 4-4.4Vrms so 6Vrms is going to sound quite lively.

]]>
By: Bülent https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16697 Thu, 12 Jan 2023 21:59:38 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16697 Hi, thanks for the review, i have a cambridge edge nq it has 6Vrms + 6Vrms balanced output, is this good enough for the envy with the susvara?

]]>
By: Marcus https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16377 Tue, 07 Jun 2022 10:38:03 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16377 In reply to LioS-12.

I think the Envy has more PRaT with the Susvara compared to the OOR which is very neutral. Yes, the Susvara has a much larger staging quality compared to the LCD-5.

]]>
By: LioS-12 https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16376 Tue, 07 Jun 2022 10:36:08 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16376 In reply to Marcus.

And you think the Ferrum is enough for the Susvara or the Envy will be much better?
Because some people was a little disappointed with the Ferrum on the Susvara.

The susvara is much more airy than the lcd-5?

Thanks again.

]]>
By: Marcus https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16375 Fri, 03 Jun 2022 12:17:48 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16375 In reply to LioS-12.

I like the Susvara better than the LCD-5 in general, but that is my own preference.

]]>
By: LioS-12 https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16374 Fri, 03 Jun 2022 11:50:03 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16374 In reply to Marcus.

The DAC is Hugo2.
I also read all this review but wanna to ask anyway.
You like the Sus better than the lcd-5 with the Envy?

]]>
By: Marcus https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16368 Mon, 30 May 2022 14:22:42 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16368 In reply to LioS-12.

If you click on page 2 of the review and scroll down there is a dedicated section for the Suvara pairing with the Envy, (roughly 3-4 paragraphs).

LCD-5 has good pipes for vocals in its own right and pairs well with the Envy. My suggestion is to ensure you get a DAC behind the Envy that’s not too sterile and bright as the LCD-5 is quite mid-forward. The dynamics are very good with this pairing.

]]>
By: LioS-12 https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16367 Mon, 30 May 2022 14:07:51 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16367 What you can say about this amp with the Susvara?
The vocals and midrange are still intimate and lifelike you think?
and with the ability to breath and so on.. or that is not put too much focus on this regard?

Also about the LCD-5 – what you think about the midrange/vocals with this amp?

Thanks.

]]>
By: P. Wang https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16365 Sun, 29 May 2022 14:29:24 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16365 Wow, Feliks Audio is making more and more margin from their products. Their products were very competitive for the price when they first started. Now, it is ridiculous.

]]>
By: Marcus https://headfonics.com/feliks-audio-envy-review/#comment-16342 Sun, 22 May 2022 01:00:26 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=55758#comment-16342 In reply to Mohit jain.

Because we do not have the Nirvana to compare it with.

]]>