Comments on: Shanling MW200 Review https://headfonics.com/shanling-mw200-review/ Independent Portable and Desktop Audio Reviews Mon, 03 Jan 2022 19:54:15 +0000 hourly 1 By: Tal https://headfonics.com/shanling-mw200-review/#comment-13254 Mon, 23 Aug 2021 04:37:11 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=44627#comment-13254 In reply to J.T..

Thanks for the comparison. I have been unhappy with FiiO’s app implementation in the past. So wanting to try this product first.

]]>
By: J.T. https://headfonics.com/shanling-mw200-review/#comment-11901 Mon, 07 Dec 2020 07:57:07 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=44627#comment-11901 In reply to ant.

There are actually a lot more products that offer similar features not limited to the FiiO bt2. I had the chance the try the bt2 which has longer playback hours and a similar set of features, objectively speaking its build quality is not as premium as the Shanling so as the output level. You can pick out more power/ density is in the mid-bass on the mw200 which sounds overall fuller, bt2 is cleaner and packs in less punching power but that gives it more playback time.

The price of the mw200 is closer to the BTR5 too that is why I associate them. Despite that fact, if you don’t need NFC, better build, and uses more sensitive IEM with good bass, the bt2 could be a more affordable option with longer playback hours.

]]>
By: ant https://headfonics.com/shanling-mw200-review/#comment-11881 Sat, 05 Dec 2020 20:12:27 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=44627#comment-11881 In reply to Darryl.

I have the Fiio, and I see that as the most direct competitor in terms of form factor and features. I was hoping for a bit of a comparison between the two. Seems like an incomplete review.

]]>
By: Darryl https://headfonics.com/shanling-mw200-review/#comment-11880 Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:28:57 +0000 https://headfonics.com/?p=44627#comment-11880 fiio lc-bt2 is ten times better,last longer and is cheaper

]]>