Comments on: 64 Audio A6 Review https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/ Independent Portable and Desktop Audio Reviews Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:57:52 +0000 hourly 1 By: Marcus https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-6707 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 05:15:46 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-6707 In reply to Alexandra.

No worries, not sure what will happen with 64 Audio as they have a new guy there who is not very responsive but will catch up with them at CanJam. Oh and the reason why you might not see your comments right away is our cache system. Sometimes it holds things back a few mins.

]]> By: Alexandra https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-6700 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:16:22 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-6700 In reply to Marcus.

Checked out the v8 review, looks like a8 should end up being “very okay unit” for someone who appreciates extended, detailed bass, but ideally not at the expense of mids :).

But I think I’ll still wait for your impressions of the “modern a8” in March.

Thank you very much!

]]> By: Marcus https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-6676 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 02:19:38 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-6676 In reply to Alexandra.

Actually we have done the V8 review a long time ago and I would presume the a8 is not that far off. However I won’t know until March at CanJam when I demo it thanks.

]]> By: Alexandra https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-6675 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:41:09 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-6675 Good afternoon, Marcus!
Thanks for very informative review.

Do you have any plans to compare them to the 64 Audio’s A8 ?

As far as I understand the main difference is two “extra” armatures for bass on A8 (4x bass, 2x mid, 2x high), and I’m really curious as to your opinion on how that affects overall sound.

]]> By: albert https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-6501 Sat, 09 Dec 2017 19:03:04 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-6501 How are these in terms of resolution and detail after cable upgrades? Can they compare with, say the… CA Vegas? (I’m trying to decide between these and the Empire Ears Athena, but I doubt you’ve reviewed it in depth.

]]> By: headfonics https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-5918 Sat, 02 Sep 2017 21:05:00 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-5918 In reply to Stephen Anning.

When you say cord, you mean the cable?

]]> By: Stephen Anning https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-5917 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:55:00 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-5917 In reply to Stephen Anning.

*thin layer of plastic

]]> By: Stephen Anning https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-5916 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:54:00 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-5916 I have the 1964 Adel A6’s and within a month they broke. More than half of the 6ish people I know with 1964 A series have had breakages in the mould or the cord. The mould is a thing layer of plastic, it’s not solid inside at all. The cable it reeeeeeally thin. I just don’t understand why at this insanely expensive price the build quality is so low.

]]> By: headfonics https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-5344 Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:12:00 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-5344 In reply to Sergio.

Depends on your budget, the new HA-2SE is better than the HA-2 and we have a review of that out currently which you might want to check on. It’s slimmer and stacks better than the Mojo and has analog inputs and of course cheaper. Tonally though I prefer the Mojo, it just has that bit more detail and a blacker background.

]]> By: Sergio https://headfonics.com/the-a6-by-64-audio/#comment-5343 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:09:00 +0000 http://headfonics.com/?p=15329#comment-5343 Thanks for the review. I’ll be trying out the cables, but I also wanted to ask you about a good DAC for these IEMs. Would you consider the HA-2SE to be a good match for these or would a Mojo be a better option? I’m looking at using these with my Iphone, so the less cables possible the better. Thanks!

]]>