Comments on: HIFIMAN Ananda Nano Review

By: Louis Gonzalez

Louis Gonzalez — Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:15:49 +0000

In reply to Ignacio Perez. Hi Ignacio. I know the Nano is an upgrade from the original Ananda but unfortunately I don't have the a Aeolus so I can't say anything else. I can say that the Nano are less peaky than the originals but they have better bass and are less veiled.

By: Ignacio Perez

Ignacio Perez — Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:23:30 +0000

Thanks a lot for your review on the Ananda Nano. I have the “regular” Ananda and am thinking of going for the ZMF Aeolus. Would this be an improvement/upgrade?

Best wishes

By: Marcus

Marcus — Wed, 06 Dec 2023 04:28:51 +0000

In reply to Albe. Thanks for the spot and now updated :)

By: Albe

Albe — Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:24:08 +0000

Hi thanks for your review, I own Nano since September and I love it, it’s impedance is 14ohm not 32 ohm

By: Louis Gonzalez

Louis Gonzalez — Sun, 03 Dec 2023 15:01:01 +0000

Hi Linknet. I use a tone sweep generator to test how even the frequencies are reproduced. That’s how I found the peak. It’s not a bad one, I’ve heard much worst. It just gives the Nano a bright touch. I tamed it by dropping the peak around 3 decibels only. It’s not a con if it’s fixable. Oh and if you look around the Stealth had the same issue and some even posted some graphs in that you can clearly see the peak. The OG version also had the peak if you look around for older graphs.

By: Linknet

Linknet — Sun, 03 Dec 2023 08:01:19 +0000

Thanks for the review.
You wrote “There seems to be lots of energy at the 7 kHz point that needs taming.”. So why did you not put this in the cons ? It’s kind of giving an incorrect impression to the people who will just have a look at it…
This is the major problem with the Nano specially for the people who don’t EQ…
The Ananda Stealth version (not the OG) did not have this problem. That’s why it is be the better version for those who don’t EQ.